Validity and reliability of the SBI (Spanish Burnout Inventory) in medical surgical specialists
Abstract
Introduction. Burnout Syndrome is the term used to describe the psychological response to patient care-related chronic work stress. Studies have found that the prevalence of practitioner burnout in Colombia ranges between 17.6% and 45%. Given the importance of this phenomenon in our setting, we decided to carry out a validation and reliability study of the Spanish Burnout Inventory (SBI).
Objective. To assess the validity and reliability of the SBI in medical surgical specialists working in fourteen health care facilities in Antioquia (Colombia) in 2018.
Methods. The study was conducted in 14 healthcare institutions among 8 surgical specialties. The tool consists of 20 items collected by means of face-to-face interviews under the supervision of a psychologist, and maintaining confidentiality. The psychometric assessment included content validity (CV), construct validity using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and reliability using Cronbach’s Alpha.
Results. The study sample consisted of 234 participants. CV of the tool was 0.82. The CFA showed acceptable model fit, with the results of goodness-of-fit being χ2=384.578 (p<0.000; df: 165), RMSEA = 0.075 [90% CI: 0.066 – 0.085], CFI = 0.953, TLI = 0.946 and WRMR = 1.074. The SBI Cronbach’s alpha was 0.79.
Conclusion. The SBI showed acceptable CV levels for all the items and domains. The SBI is a valid tool with adequate reliability for use in medical surgical specialists of healthcare institutions in Antioquia-Colombia.
References
Maslach C, Jackson SE, Leiter MP. The Maslach Burnout Inventory. Third Edit. 1986.
Maslach C, Jackson SE, Maslach C, Jackson SE. Patterns of burnout among a national sample of public contact workers. J Health Hum Resour Adm. 1984;7(2):189-212.
Maslach C, Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP. Job Burnout. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;53:397-422. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397
Freudenberger HJ. Staff Burn-Out. J Soc Issues. 1974;30(1):159-65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1974.tb00706.x
World Health Orgnization (WHO). Report 2000. Health Systems: Improving Performance. Vol. 78, Ginebra; 2000.
World Health Organization (WHO). Burn-out an “occupational phenomenon”: International Classification of Diseases [internet]. 2019 [citado: 2019 may. 28]. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/news/item/28-05-2019-burn-out-an-occupational-phenomenon-international-classification-of-diseases.2019.
Organización Mundial de la Salud. Informe sobre la salud en el mundo 2001. Salud mental: nuevos conocimientos, nuevas esperanzas [Internet]. 2001 [citado: 2001 oct.]. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/whr/2001/en/whr01_es.pdf?ua=1
Guevara CA, Henao DP. Síndrome de desgaste profesional en médicos internos y residentes. Hospital Universitario del Valle, Cali, 2002. Colombia Médica. 2004; 35:173-8.
Paredes OL. Prevalencia del Síndrome de Burnout en residentes de especialidades médico quirúrgicas, su relación con el bienestar psicológico y con variables sociodemográficas y laborales. Rev Med la Fac Med. 2008;16(1):25-32.
Gil-Monte PR. CESQT Cuestionario para la evaluación del síndrome de quemarse por el trabajo. Manual Ediciones TEA; 2011. doi: https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy9-1.vfce
Gil-Monte PR, Unda Rojas S, Sandoval Ocaña JI. Validez factorial del “Cuestionario para la Evaluación del Síndrome de Quemarse por el Trabajo” (CESQT) en una muestra de maestros mexicanos. Salud Ment. 2009;32(3):205-14.
Gil-Monte PR. El síndrome de quemarse por el trabajo (síndrome de Burnout) en profesionales de enfermería. Rev Electrónica Int PSY. 2003;1(1):19-33.
Gil-Monte PR, Carlotto MS GCS. Validation of the Brazilian version of the “Spanish Burnout Inventory” in teachers. Rev Saude Publica. 2010;44(1):140-7.
Gil-Monte P, Unda S, Sandoval O. Validez factorial del Cuestionario para la Evaluación del Síndrome de Quemarse por el Trabajo (CESQT). Salud Ment. 2009;32(3):205-14.
Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus Statical Analysis with latent variables User’s Guide. 2017.
Muñiz J. Teoría clásica de los test. Madrid: Pirámide, 2000.
Ferrando PJ. El análisis factorial como técnica de investigación en psicología. Papeles del Psicólogo. 2010;31(1):18-33.
Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health measurement scales, a practical guide to their development and use. Fifth Edit. Canadá: Oxford University Press; 2015. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199685219.001.0001
Streiner DL. Starting at the beginning : An introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. J Personality Assess. 2003;80(1):99-103. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18
Campo-Arias A, Oviedo HC. Propiedades psicométricas de una escala: La Consistencia Interna. Rev. Salud Pública. 2008;10(5):831-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0124-00642008000500015
Gil-Monte PR, Zúñiga-Caballero LC. Validez factorial del Cuestionario para la Evaluación del Síndrome de Quemarse por el Trabajo (CESQT) en una muestra de médicos mexicanos. Univ. Psychol. 2010;9(1):169-78. doi: https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy9-1.vfce
De Vet H.C.W, Terwee C.B, Mokkink L.B, Knol D.L. Measurement in Medicine, A Practical guides. First published. USA: Cambridge University Press; 2011. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511996214
Luján-Tangarife JA, Cardona-Arias JA. Construcción y validación de escalas de medición en salud: Revisión de propiedades psicométricas. Arch Med. 2015;11(3):1-10.
Pedrosa I, Suárez-Álvarez J, García-Cueto E. Evidencias sobre la validez de contenido: Avances teóricos y métodos para su estimación. Acción Psicológica]. 2014;10(2):3-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.5944/ap.10.2.11820
Escobar-Pérez J, Cuervo-Martínez Á. Validez de contenido y juicio de expertos: Una aproximación a su utilización. Av en Medición. 2008;6:27-36.
Ayre C, Scally AJ. Critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio : Revisiting the original methods of calculation. Meas Eval Couns Dev. 2013;41(1):79-86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175613513808
Lawshe CH. A Quantitative approach to content validity. Pers Psychol. 1975;28:563-75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
Wilson FR, Pan W, Schumsky DA. Recalculation of the critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio. Meas Eval Couns Dev. 2012;43(3):197-210. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175612440286
Kendall MG, Smith BB. The problem of m rankings. Ann Math Stat. 1939;10(3):275-87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177732186
Suh Y. The performance of maximum likelihood and weighted least square mean and variance adjusted estimators in testing differential item functioning with nonnormal trait distributions. Struct Equ Model A Multidiscip J. 2015;22(January 2015):568-80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.937669
Brown TA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. 2nd Edi. USA: Guilford Press; 2015.
Schreiber JB, Nora A, Stage FK, Barlow EA, King J. Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results : A Review. J Educ Res. 2006;99(6):323-37. doi: https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338
Sánchez R, Echeverry J. Validación de escalas de medición en salud. Rev Salud Pública. 2004;6(3):302-18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0124-00642004000300006
Maslach C, Jackson SE, Leiter MP. The Maslach Burnout Inventory Manual. En: Evaluating Stress: A Book of Resourses [Internet]. 1997 [citado: 2018 may. 25]. p. 191-218. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277816643_The_Maslach_Burnout_Inventory_Manual
Gil-Monte PR, Peiró JM. Validez factorial del Maslach Burnout Inventory en una muestra multiocupacional. Psicothema. 1999;11(3):679-89.
Peñaloza S. Validez y confiabilidad del CESQT en profesionales de enfermeria. Tesis de Maestría, Universidad Nacional, Bogotá; 2008.
Córdoba L, Tamayo JA, González MA, Martínez MI, Rosales A, Barbato SH. Adaptation and validation of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey in Cali, Colombia*. Colomb Med. 2011;42(3):286-93. doi: https://doi.org/10.25100/cm.v42i3.874
Gil-Monte PR, Manzano-García G. Psychometric properties of the Spanish Burnout Inventory among staff nurses. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2015;22:756-63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12255
Downloads
| Article metrics | |
|---|---|
| Abstract views | |
| Galley vies | |
| PDF Views | |
| HTML views | |
| Other views | |
