Exploration and measurement of inequities in the occurrence of hospital adverse events in Colombia

Kelly Estrada-Orozco; Hernando Gaitán-Duarte; Javier Eslava-Schmalbach

doi:10.5554/22562087.e1155

Kelly Estrada-Orozco Patient Safety Research Unit, Clinical Research Institute, School of Medicine, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5022-5572
Hernando Gaitán-Duarte School of Medicine, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2939-3648
Javier Eslava-Schmalbach School of Medicine, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1502-2918

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5554/22562087.e1155

Keywords: Device-associated infections, Patient safety, Equity in health, Adverse events, Inequity

Abstract References How to Cite Downloads

Abstract

Introduction: Device-associated infections (DAIs) are preventable adverse events that represent a critical issue for patient safety. These infections, including central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI), catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI), and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), can be influenced by geographic factors, insurance schemes, sex, and age, leading to differential risks and creating another form of health inequity.

Objective: To explore and measure inequities in patient safety associated with DAIs in Colombia, using data from the SIVIGILA system (2012–2022).

Methods: This observational, analytical study analyzed data on CLABSI, CAUTI, and VAP reported in SIVIGILA. Incidence rates were estimated using random-effects metamodels adjusted for region, year, and device-days. Inequities were formally assessed using coefficients of variation, group deviations, risk differences, and relative risks across comparison groups (region, age group, municipalities).

Results: A total of 750 aggregate reports covering over 49,101 DAI events from 2012 to 2022 were analyzed. CLABSI accounted for 44.4% of events. DAIs were more frequent among men (55.2%), in the contributory insurance scheme (49.3%), followed by the subsidized scheme (42.1%), with only 3% occurring in individuals without affiliation to the general social security system (SGSSS). Mortality associated with these events was 19.9%. Bivariate analyses and metamodels revealed inequities in DAI occurrence, particularly in areas with lower access and resources. DAIs showed disparities across departments, regions, sexes, and age groups. Most municipalities and departments reported rates below 3 cases per 1,000 device-days for CLABSI and VAP, but some departments exhibited risks up to four times higher. CAUTI showed a more homogeneous risk distribution.

Conclusions: The study highlights significant inequities in the occurrence of DAIs in Colombia. These findings underscore the need for regional and targeted strategies to enhance patient safety and reduce disparities in healthcare.

References

1. Organización Mundial de la salud (OMS). Reto mundial en pro de la seguridad del paciente. OMS; 2005.

2. Runciman B, Merry A, Walton M. Safety and ethics in healthcare: A guide to getting it right. Hampshire: CRC Press; 2007. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315607443.

3. Estrada-Orozco K, Gaitán-Duque H, Eslava-Schmalbach J. Patient safety as a public health problem. Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology. 2024;52. https://doi.org/10.5554/22562087.e1096.

4. Okoroh JS, Uribe EF, Weingart S. Racial and ethnic disparities in patient safety. J Pat Safety. 2017;13(3):153-61. https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000133.

5. Shen JJ, Cochran CR, Mazurenko O, Moseley CB, Shan G, Mukalian R, et al. Racial and insurance status disparities in patient safety indicators among hospitalized patients. Ethn Dis. 2016;26(3):443-52. https://doi.org/10.18865/ed.26.3.443.

6. Piccardi C, Detollenaere J, Vanden Bussche P, Willems S. Social disparities in patient safety in primary care: a systematic review. Int J Equity Health. 2018;17(1):114. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-018-0828-7.

7. Stockwell DC, Landrigan CP, Toomey SL, Westfall MY, Liu S, Parry G, et al. Racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in patient safety events for hospitalized children. Hosp Pediatr. 2019;9(1):1-5. https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2018-0131.

8. Gardener H, Leifheit EC, Lichtman JH, Wang Y, Wang K, Gutierrez CM, et al. Racial/ethnic disparities in mortality among medicare beneficiaries in the FL - PR CR eSD Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(1):e009649. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009649.

9. Ministerio de la Protección Social. Lineamientos para la implementación de políticas en seguridad del paciente. Bogotá: Ministerio de la Protección Social; 2008.

10. Eslava-Schmalbach JH, Buitrago-Gutiérrez G, Rincón-Rodríguez CJ. Inequidad de la mortalidad evitable. Conceptos, desarrollo y medición. Primera Edición. Bogotá: Facultad de Medicina Universidad Nacional de Colombia; 2014.

11. Eslava-Schmalbach J, Buitrago G. La medición de desigualdades e inequidades en salud. Rev Colomb Psiquiat. 2010;39:771-81.

12. Marmot M. Achieving health equity: from root causes to fair outcomes. Lancet. 2007;370(9593):1153-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61385-3.

13. Marmot M WR. Social determinants of health. Oxford: Oxford Press; 2005.

14. Wagstaff A, Paci P, van Doorslaer E. On the measurement of inequalities in health. Soc Sci Med. 1991;33(5):545-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(91)90212-u.

15. Schlotheuber A, Hosseinpoor AR. Summary measures of health inequality: a review of existing measures and their application. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(6):3697. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063697.

16. Mora-Moreo L, Estrada-Orozco K, Espinosa O, Melgarejo LM. Characterization of the population affiliated to the subsidized health insurance scheme in Colombia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Equity in Health. 2023;22(1):28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-022-01818-x.

17. Barker TH, Migliavaca CB, Stein C, Colpani V, Falavigna M, Aromataris E, et al. Conducting proportional meta-analysis in different types of systematic reviews: a guide for synthesisers of evidence. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021;21(1):189. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01381-z.

18. World Health Organization. Health Equity Assesament Tool (HEAT):Software for exploringand comparing health inequalitie in countries. 3.0 ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019.

19. Banco de la República. La salud en las regiones colombianas: inequidad y morbilidad. Bogotá: Banco de la Republica; 2014.

20. Rodríguez Hernández JM, Ariza Ruiz LK, Castro Barbudo D, Vivas Sánchez P, Matallana Gómez MA, Gómez Hernández LJ, et al. Analysis of inequalities and inequities in maternal mortality in Chocó, Colombia. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20126095.

21. Hoops K, Pittman E, Stockwell DC. Disparities in patient safety voluntary event reporting: A scoping review. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2024;50(1):41-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2023.10.009.

22. Hegde S, Carlos RC. Ethnic disparities in adverse events of chemotherapy for breast cancer: A scoping review. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(16_suppl):e18524-e. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.e18524

How to Cite

1.

Estrada-Orozco K, Gaitán-Duarte H, Eslava-Schmalbach J. Exploration and measurement of inequities in the occurrence of hospital adverse events in Colombia. Colomb. J. Anesthesiol. [Internet]. 2025 Jun. 5 [cited 2025 Dec. 13];54(1). Available from: https://www.revcolanest.com.co/index.php/rca/article/view/1155