Contributions from the values history to the right to die with dignity
Abstract
The values history (VH) is a valuable tool of the advance care planning (ACP) process for all patients – regardless of health status - and may ultimately lead to the drafting of a document. This article outlines the benefits of VH as a process of personal reflection and as a document—either standalone or attached to an advance directives document (ADD)—to guide surrogate decision-making. The implementation of VH is advocated within ACP programs and the right to die with dignity. Likewise, the article supports establishing ACP as a standard practice for every individual and in every healthcare institution, regardless of the level of care complexity, with the aim of integrating the set of rights or legal powers that enable the right to die with dignity in Colombia.References
1. Lasmarías C, Delgado S, Rietjens J, Korfage I, Gómez-Batiste X. Definition and recommendations for advance care planning: an international consensus supported by the European Association for Palliative Care. Med Paliat. 2019;26(3):236-49. https://doi.org/10.20986/medpal.2019.1019/2018
2. Dening KH, Jones L, Sampson EL. Preferences for end-of-life care: a nominal group study of people with dementia and their family carers. Palliat Med. 2013;27(5):409-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216312464094.
3. Doukas DJ, McCullough LB. The values history: The evaluation of the patient’s values and advance directives. J Fam Pract. 1991;32(2):145-53.
4. Prommer EE. Using the values-based history to fine-tune advance care planning for oncology patients. J Cancer Edu. 2010;25(1):66-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13187-009-0014-0
5. Peters C, Chiverton P. Use of a values history in approaching medical advance directives with psychiatric patients. J Psychos Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2003;41(8):28-36. https://doi.org/10.3928/0279-3695-20030801-11
6. Richman K. Ethics and the metaphysics of medicine. Reflections on health and beneficence. En: McGee G. and Caplan A., editores. Chapter 6. Advance Directives. Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 2004. p. 135-55.
7. Doukas DJ, McCullough LB, Crane M. Enhancing advance directive discussions using the values history. En: Gallo J, Gogner H, Fulmer T, Paveza G. (Eds.), Handbook of geriatric assessment. 4nd ed. Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2005. p. 59-75.
8. Lambert P, Gibson JM, Nathanson P. The values history: An innovation in surrogate medical decision-making. J Am Soc Law, Med Ethics. 1990;18(3):202-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720X.1990.tb00023.x
9. Kolarik RC, Arnold RM, Fischer GS, Hanusa BH. Advance care planning. A comparison of values statements and treatment preferences. J Gen Inter Med. 2002;(17):618-24. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10933.x
10. Winter L. Patient values and preferences for end-of-life treatments: are values better predictors than a living will? J Palliat Med. 2013;16(4):362-8. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2012.0303
11. Karel MJ, Moye J, Bank A, Azar AR. Three methods of assessing values for advance care planning: comparing persons with and without dementia. J Aging Health. 2007;19(1):123-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264306296394
12. Doukas DJ, Gorenflo DW. Analyzing the values history: An evaluation of patient medical values and advance directives. J Clin Ethics. 1993;(4):41-5.
13. Karel MJ, Powell J, Cantor MD. Using a values discussion guide to facilitate communication in advance care planning. Patient Educ Counsel. 2004;55(1):22-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0738-3991(03)00246-5
14. Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. Resolución 229 de 2020 [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jan 28]. Available at: https://www.minsalud.gov.co/Normatividad_Nuevo/Resoluci%C3%B3n%20No.%20229%20de%202020.pdf
15. Álvarez Acuña AM, Buitrago Martín CL, Ceballos Vejarano A. Content of the advance directives form of the pain and palliative care services in Colombia. Cross-sectional study. Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology. 2023;52(2):e1093. https://doi.org/10.5554/22562087.e1093
16. Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. Resolución 2665 de 2018 [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jan 28]. Available at: https://www.minsalud.gov.co/Normatividad_Nuevo/Resoluci%C3%B3n%20No.%202665%20de%202018.pdf
17. Porteri C. Advance directives as a tool to respect patients’ values and preferences: discussion on the case of Alzheimer’s disease. BMC Med Ethics. 2018;19(9). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0249-6
18. Dixon J, Karagiannidou M, Knapp M. The effectiveness of advance care planning in improving end-of-life outcomes for people with dementia and their carers: A systematic review and critical discussion. J Pain Symp Manag. 2018;55(1):132-50.el. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.04.009
19. Sedini C, Biotto M, Crespi Bel'skij LM, Moroni Grandini RE, Cesari M. Advance care planning and advance directives: an overview of the main critical issues. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2022;34(2):325-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-021-02001-y
20. Beaufort ID, Van de Vathorst S. Dementia and assisted suicide and euthanasia. J Neurol. 2016;263(7):1463-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-016-8095-2
21. Scheunemann L, Arnold R, White D. The facilitated values history. Helping Surrogates make authentic decisions for incapacitated patients with advanced illness. Am J Respirat Crit Care Med. 2012;186(6):480-6. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201204-0710CP
22. Congreso de la República de Colombia. Ley 1733 de 2014. [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jan 28]. Available at: http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_1733_2014.html
23. Prieto-Martínez P, Rodríguez Suárez N, Zárate-Velasco DL. Department of Humanism and Bioethics at the Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Colombia: An update based on 8 years of service. Clin Ethics. 2023;18(4):393-403. https://doi.org/10.1177/14777509221077389
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2025 Sociedad Colombiana de Anestesiología y Reanimación (S.C.A.R.E.)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
| Article metrics | |
|---|---|
| Abstract views | |
| Galley vies | |
| PDF Views | |
| HTML views | |
| Other views | |
