Interactions between home care and hospital care during pregnancy and postpartum among low-income women in a maternity clinic in Cartagena, Colombia

  • Vanesa Giraldo-Gartner a. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, USA . b. Critical Medical Anthropology Group
  • Catalina Muñoz-Rondón a. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Xochimilco, Mexico City, Mexico. b. Critical Medical Anthropology Group
  • María Teresa Buitrago-Echverri Critical Medical Anthropology Group
  • César Ernesto Abadía-Barrero Critical Medical Anthropology Group
Keywords: Gender and health, Family practice, Pregnancy, Abdominal, Culture, Delivery of health care

Abstract

Introduction: This paper proposes an approach to maternal health from the care process perspective to understand how determinants of health manifest in the daily experience of women.

Objective: To describe and analyze the interaction between the domestic and clinical care during pregnancy and post-partum among women who live in adverse socio-economic conditions.

Methodology: Qualitative study based on semi-structured and in-depth interviews, participant observation, and analysis of secondary sources. Twenty women who received care at a maternity clinic in the city of Cartagena, Colombia were interviewed. Participants had an average age of 25, lived in adverse socio-economic conditions and had at least one of the following obstetric risks: preterm labor symptoms, previous abortions, or mild preeclampsia. Participant observation took place at the clinic and at the residence of four patients. In addition, six in-depth interviews were conducted with health workers of the clinic.

Results: The socio-economic conditions of women and their family dynamics determine their experiences of maternity. Relatives, usually other women, are the main agents of care. The most important care activities revolve around physical activities, transportation, nutrition, and exposure to the environment. The characteristics of domestic care play an important role in the clinical environment.

Conclusion: Family-centered care requires acknowledging the role of relatives and other members of the women's social networks as guides in the healthcare process. Likewise, recognizing the socio-economic conditions of women requires adapting health services to the needs of women and their families in order to avoid reproducing social inequalities.

References

1. Vasco M. Estrategias de manejo mediante competencias no técnicas para la disminución de la morbimortalidad materna y perinatal. Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2013;41:20-3.

2. Romero M, Ramos S, Ábalos E. Modelos de análisis de la morbi-mortalidad materna. Buenos Aires. Observatorio de Salud Sexual y Reproductiva, CEDES, CREP, IIE/ANM; 2010 Octubre. 8 p. Reporte No.: 3.

3. Pastor M, Herrera L, Vásquez I. Conocimientos y prácticas sobre autocuidado que influyen en la salud de la mujer, durante el embarazo y el puerperio. Rev Fac Cienc Méd. 2014;3:13-8.

4. Vásquez CL, Lozano MIP. Cuidados genéricos para restablecer el equilibrio durante el puerperio. Rev Cubana Enferm. 2011;27:88-97.

5. Montes Muñoz MJ. Cuerpos gestantes y orden social. Discursos y prácticas en el embarazo. Index de enfermería. 2008;17:25-9.

6. Sadler M. Así me nacieron a mi hija" Aportes antropológicos para el análisis de la atención biomédica del parto hospitalario [Tesis] . [Santiago de Chile] Universidad de Chile; 2003, p 175.

7. García-Jordá D, Díaz Bernal Z. Perspectiva antropológica y de género en el análisis de la atención al embarazo, parto y puerperio. Rev Cuba Salud Públ. 2010;36:330-6.

8. Dixon LZ. Obstetrics in a time of violence: Mexican midwives critique routine hospital practices. Med Anthropol Q. 2014;29:1-30.

9. Smith-Oka V. Bodies of risk: Constructing motherhood in a Mexican public hospital. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75:2275 82.

10. Beninguisse G, De Brouwere V. Tradition and modernity in Cameroon: the confrontation between social demand and biomedical logics of health services. Afr J Reprod Health. 2004;8:152-75.

11. Cartagena Cómo Vamos. Evaluación de Calidad de Vida 2014. Cartagena de Indias. Red de Ciudades Cómo Vamos. 2015 Septiembre 175 p. Reporte No.:10.

12. Rucks S. Bolívar y Cartagena frente a los Objetivos de Desarrollo del Milenio. Bogotá: Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo; 2012, p 146.

13. Vasilachis de Gialdino I. La investigación cualitativa. In: Vasilachis de Gialdino I, editor. Las estrategias de investigación cualitativa. Barcelona: Gedisa Editoral; 2006. p. 23-64.

14. Marshall C, Rossman G. Designing qualitative research. 3rd edición Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 1999. p. 344.

15. Agar M. An ethnography by any other name. Forum Qual Soc Res. 2006;7:36.

16. Sandoval CA. Investigación Cualitativa. Bogotá: Instituto Colombiano para el Fomento de la Educación Superior; 2002, p 313.

17. Giraldo V. De fríos y calores maternales: apuntes de un replanteamiento de la investigación. Red Posgrados CLACSO. 2012;20:14.

18. Smith-Oka V. Microaggressions and the reproduction of social inequalities in medical encounters in Mexico. Soc Sci Med. 2015;143:9-16.

19. Castro R. La vida en la adversidad: el significado de la salud y la reproducción en la pobreza. México DF: CRIM-UNAM; 2000. p. 541.

20. Frampton S, Guastello S, Brady C. Patient-centered Care Improvement Guide. Derby: Planetree Inc y Picker Institute; 2008. p. 247.

21. Mead N, Bower P. Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:1087-110.

22. Pope R, Graham L, Patel S. Woman-centred care. Int J Nurs Stud. 2001;38:227-38.

23. Zwelling E, Phillips CR. Family-centered maternity care in the new millennium: is it real or is it imagined? J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2001;15:1-12.

24. Dehlendorf C, Kimport K, Levy K, Steinauer J. A qualitative analysis of approache to contraceptive counseling. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014;46:233-40.

25. Farrell RM, Nutter B, Agatisa PK. Patient-centered prenatal counseling: aligning obstetric healthcare professionals with needs of pregnant women. Women Health. 2015;55:280-96.

26. Kaimal AJ, Kuppermann M. Decision making for primary Cesarean delivery: the role of patient and provider preferences. Semin Perinatol. 2012;36:384-9.

27. Ali M, Qazi MS, Seuc A. Seeking what matters: determinants of clients' satisfaction in obstetric care services in Pakistan. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2014;26:481-7.

28. Kleinman A. Patients and healers in the context of culture. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1981. p. 427.

29. Zolla C, Carrillo A. Mujeres, saberes médicos e institucionalización. In: Figueroa J, editor. La condición de la mujer en el espacio de la salud. México, DF: El Colegio de México; 1998. p. 160-88.

30. Menéndez E. Intencionalidad, experiencia y función: la articulación de los saberes médicos. Rev Antropol Soc. 2005;14:33-69.
How to Cite
1.
Giraldo-Gartner V, Muñoz-Rondón C, Buitrago-Echverri MT, Abadía-Barrero CE. Interactions between home care and hospital care during pregnancy and postpartum among low-income women in a maternity clinic in Cartagena, Colombia. Colomb. J. Anesthesiol. [Internet]. 2016 Jul. 1 [cited 2024 Apr. 16];44(3):222-7. Available from: https://www.revcolanest.com.co/index.php/rca/article/view/372

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2016-07-01
How to Cite
1.
Giraldo-Gartner V, Muñoz-Rondón C, Buitrago-Echverri MT, Abadía-Barrero CE. Interactions between home care and hospital care during pregnancy and postpartum among low-income women in a maternity clinic in Cartagena, Colombia. Colomb. J. Anesthesiol. [Internet]. 2016 Jul. 1 [cited 2024 Apr. 16];44(3):222-7. Available from: https://www.revcolanest.com.co/index.php/rca/article/view/372
Section
Original

Altmetric

Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views
QR Code

Some similar items: