Critical appraisal of "Prescription of long-acting opioids and mortality in patients with chronic nonmalignant pain"
References
1. Ray W, Chung C, Murray K, Hall K, Stein C. Prescription of long-acting opioids and mortality in patients with chronic noncancer pain. JAMA. 2016;315:2415.
2. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Español. Programa de habilidades en lectura crítica español. [Internet] July 2016. Available in: http://www.redcaspe.org/herramientas/instrumentos.
3. Daubresse M, Chang H, Yu Y, Viswanathan S, Shah N, Stafford R, et al. Ambulatory diagnosis and treatment of nonmalignant pain in the United States, 2000-2010. Med Care. 2013;51:870-8.
4. Okie S. A flood of opioids, a rising tide of deaths. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1981-5.
5. Bohnert A. Association between opioid prescribing patterns and opioid overdose-related deaths. JAMA. 2011;305:1315.
6. Chou R, Turner J, Devine E, Hansen R, Sullivan S, Blazina I, et al. The effectiveness and risks of long-term opioid therapy for chronic pain: a systematic review for a National Institutes of Health Pathways to Prevention Workshop. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162:276.
7. Von Elm E, Altman D, Egger M, Pocock S, G0tzsche P, Vandenbroucke J. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e296.
8. Szklo M, Nieto F. Epidemiology. Sudbury, Mass: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2007.
9. Austin P. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivar Behav Res. 2011;46:399-424.
10. Guertin J, Rahme E, Dormuth C, LeLorier J. Head to head comparison of the propensity score and the high-dimensional propensity score matching methods. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16:1-10.
11. Martí H, Pérez-Bárcena J, Fiol M, Marrugat J, Navarro C, Aldasoro E, et al. Analysis with the propensity score of the association between likelihood of treatment and event of interest in observational studies. An example with myocardial reperfusion. Rev Esp Cardiol (English Edition). 2005;58:126-36.
12. Vélez M, Egurrola J, Jaimes F. Ronda clínica y epidemiológica Uso de la puntuación de propensión (propensity score) en estudios no experimentales. Iatreia. 2013;26:95-101.
13. Haukoos J, Lewis R. The propensity score. JAMA. 2015;314:1637.
14. Pattanayak C, Rubin D, Zell E. Propensity score methods for creating covariate balance in observational studies. Rev Esp Cardiol (English Edition). 2011;64:897-903.
15. Cox D. Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soci Ser B (Methodol). 1972;34:187-220.
16. Dowell D, Haegerich T, Chou R. CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain-united states, 2016. JAMA. 2016;315:1624.
17. Chou R. Medications for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:505.
18. Carragee E. Persistent low back pain. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1891-8.
19. Estudio Nacional de Consumo de Sustancias Psicoactivas en Colombia [Internet]. Oficina de las Naciones Unidas contra la droga y el delito. 2013 [visited 6 July 2016]. Available in: https://www.unodc.org/documents/colombia/2014/Julio/ Estudio_de_Consumo_UNODC.pdf.
20. VIII Estudio Nacional de Dolor 2014 - Prevalencia del dolor cronico en Colombia [Internet]. Acnweb.org. 2016 [visited 6 July 2016]. Available in: http://www.acnweb.org/es/ informacion/noticias/1124-viii-estudio-nacional-de-dolor-2014-prevalencia-del-dolor-cronico-en-colombia.html.
2. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Español. Programa de habilidades en lectura crítica español. [Internet] July 2016. Available in: http://www.redcaspe.org/herramientas/instrumentos.
3. Daubresse M, Chang H, Yu Y, Viswanathan S, Shah N, Stafford R, et al. Ambulatory diagnosis and treatment of nonmalignant pain in the United States, 2000-2010. Med Care. 2013;51:870-8.
4. Okie S. A flood of opioids, a rising tide of deaths. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1981-5.
5. Bohnert A. Association between opioid prescribing patterns and opioid overdose-related deaths. JAMA. 2011;305:1315.
6. Chou R, Turner J, Devine E, Hansen R, Sullivan S, Blazina I, et al. The effectiveness and risks of long-term opioid therapy for chronic pain: a systematic review for a National Institutes of Health Pathways to Prevention Workshop. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162:276.
7. Von Elm E, Altman D, Egger M, Pocock S, G0tzsche P, Vandenbroucke J. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e296.
8. Szklo M, Nieto F. Epidemiology. Sudbury, Mass: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2007.
9. Austin P. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivar Behav Res. 2011;46:399-424.
10. Guertin J, Rahme E, Dormuth C, LeLorier J. Head to head comparison of the propensity score and the high-dimensional propensity score matching methods. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16:1-10.
11. Martí H, Pérez-Bárcena J, Fiol M, Marrugat J, Navarro C, Aldasoro E, et al. Analysis with the propensity score of the association between likelihood of treatment and event of interest in observational studies. An example with myocardial reperfusion. Rev Esp Cardiol (English Edition). 2005;58:126-36.
12. Vélez M, Egurrola J, Jaimes F. Ronda clínica y epidemiológica Uso de la puntuación de propensión (propensity score) en estudios no experimentales. Iatreia. 2013;26:95-101.
13. Haukoos J, Lewis R. The propensity score. JAMA. 2015;314:1637.
14. Pattanayak C, Rubin D, Zell E. Propensity score methods for creating covariate balance in observational studies. Rev Esp Cardiol (English Edition). 2011;64:897-903.
15. Cox D. Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soci Ser B (Methodol). 1972;34:187-220.
16. Dowell D, Haegerich T, Chou R. CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain-united states, 2016. JAMA. 2016;315:1624.
17. Chou R. Medications for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:505.
18. Carragee E. Persistent low back pain. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1891-8.
19. Estudio Nacional de Consumo de Sustancias Psicoactivas en Colombia [Internet]. Oficina de las Naciones Unidas contra la droga y el delito. 2013 [visited 6 July 2016]. Available in: https://www.unodc.org/documents/colombia/2014/Julio/ Estudio_de_Consumo_UNODC.pdf.
20. VIII Estudio Nacional de Dolor 2014 - Prevalencia del dolor cronico en Colombia [Internet]. Acnweb.org. 2016 [visited 6 July 2016]. Available in: http://www.acnweb.org/es/ informacion/noticias/1124-viii-estudio-nacional-de-dolor-2014-prevalencia-del-dolor-cronico-en-colombia.html.
How to Cite
1.
Vera-Montoya M, Marín-Gavina L, Cálvache JA. Critical appraisal of "Prescription of long-acting opioids and mortality in patients with chronic nonmalignant pain". Colomb. J. Anesthesiol. [Internet]. 2016Oct.1 [cited 2021Mar.5];44(4):330–333. Available from: https://www.revcolanest.com.co/index.php/rca/article/view/611
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2016-10-01
How to Cite
1.
Vera-Montoya M, Marín-Gavina L, Cálvache JA. Critical appraisal of "Prescription of long-acting opioids and mortality in patients with chronic nonmalignant pain". Colomb. J. Anesthesiol. [Internet]. 2016Oct.1 [cited 2021Mar.5];44(4):330–333. Available from: https://www.revcolanest.com.co/index.php/rca/article/view/611
Issue
Section
Brief academy
Copyright
The Sociedad Colombiana de Anestesiología y Reanimación (S.C.A.R.E.) is the owner of all copyrights to any articles published in the journal. Published manuscripts become the permanent property of S.C.A.R.E. and may not be published elsewhere without written permission. S.C.A.R.E. keeps the right to use these manuscripts in any form, including print, video, audio and digital.
Creative Commons License
Open-access articles can be read, downloaded and shared on a free basis upon publication. The Journal publishes all articles under the CCBY- NC-ND license. Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs: CC BY- NC-ND. Of the six main licenses, this is the most restrictive because it only allows others to download and share articles as long as they give credit to the author, but they cannot in any way change the paper or use it commercially.
