Controversial issue of cricoid pressure or Sellick maneuver

  • John Jairo Páez L. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia.
  • J. Ricardo Navarro V. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia.
Keywords: Cricoid cartilage, Pressure, Cervical vertebrae, Acid aspiration syndrome

Abstract

Introduction. The Sellick maneuver or cricoid pressure is a procedure that is routinely performed in the prophylaxis for pulmonary aspiration as part of a rapid sequence intubation. It has been considered very controversial specifically on its usefulness as a standard safety practice in the emergent airway management. It usually has been considered a pressure maneuver, however it usually has seen assessed measuring Newtons (N) without considering the area of the cricoid cartilage. For this reason, it must be understood in terms of cricoid force instead of cricoid pressure.

Objetive. To highlight the controversial issues this maneuver has had over the 50 years of its use in airway management and pulmonary aspiration prevention. To explain the common error of describing it in terms of force and not pressure.

Methods. Literature review about the controversial aspects of the Sellick maneuver in emergent scenarios in anesthesia.

Conclusion. Since the initial description by Dr. Brian Arthur Sellick in 1961 of the maneuver, using cricoid pressure to prevent them regurgitation of gastric contents to the pharynx used as part of the rapid sequence induction/ intubation, there have been multiple criticisms worthwhile to review, regarding the safety it provides in protecting the airway. We recommend that the terms pressure and force be differentiated and be used more appropriately when describing the maneuver, as the area of the cartilage should be considered in these measurements.

References

1. Sellick BA. Cricoid pressure to control regurgitation of stomach contents during induction of anaesthesia. Lancet. 1961;2(7199):404-6
2. Stept WJ, Safar P. Rapid induction/intubation for prevention of gastric-content aspiration. Anesth An-alg. 1970;49(4):633-6
3. Rosen M. Anaesthesia for obstetrics. Anaesthesia. 1981;36(2):145-6
4. Kron SS. Questionable effectiveness of cricoid pressure in preventing aspiration. Anesthesiology. 1995; 83(2):431-2
5. Neilipovitz DT, Crosby ET. No evidence for decreased incidence of aspiration after rapid sequence induction. Can J Anaesth. 2007;54(9):748-64.
6. Neelakanta G. Cricoid pressure is effective in preventing esophageal regurgitation. Anaesthesiology. 2003;99(1):242.
7. Howells TH, Chamney AR, Wraight WJ, Simons RS. The application of cricoids pressure. An assessment and survey of its practice. Anaesthesia. 1983;38(5):457-60.
8. Whittington RM, Robinson JS, Thompson JM. Fatal aspiration (Mendelson's) syndrome despite antacids and cricoids pressure. Lancet. 1979;314(8136):228-30.
9. Moir DD. Maternal mortality and anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1980;52(1):1-3
10. Williamson R. Cricoid pressure. Can J Anaesth. 1989;36(5):601.
11. Turgeon AF, Nicole PC, Trepanier CA, Marcoux S, Lessard MR. Cricoid pressure does not increase the rate of failed intubation by direct laryngoscopy in adults. Anesthesiology. 2005; 102(2):315-9.
12. Vanner RG, Clarke P, Moore W, Raftery S. The effect of cricoid pressure and neck support on the view at layngoscopy. Anaesthesia. 1997;52(9):896-900.
13. Brimacombe J, White A, Berry A. Effect of cricoid pressure on the ease of insertion of the laryngeal mask airway. Br J Anaesth. 1993;71(6):800-2.
14. Snider DD, Clarke D, Finucane BT. The "BURP" maneuver worsens the glotic view when applied in combination with cricoid pressure. Can J Anaesth. 2005;52(1):100-4.
15. Moynihan RJ, Brock-Utne JG, Archer JH, Feld LH, Kreitzman TR. The effect of cricoid pressure on preventing gastric insufflation in infants and children. Anesthesiology. 1993;78(4):652-6.
16. Smith KJ, Dobranowski J, Yip G, Dauphin A, Choi PT. Cricoid pressure displaces the esophagus: an observational study using magnetic resonance imaging. Anesthesiology. 2003;99(1):60-4.
17. Rice MJ, Mancuso AA, Gibbs C, Morey TE, Gravenstein N, Deitte LA. Cricoid pressure results in compression of the postcricoid hypopharynx: the esophageal position is irrelevant. Anesth Analg. 2009;109(5):1546-52.
18. Ellis DY, Harris T, Zideman D. Cricoid pressure in emergency department rapid sequence Tracheal intubations: a risk-benefit analysis. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;50(6):653-65.
19. Brimacombe JR, Berry AM. Cricoid pressure. Can J Anaesth. 1997;44(4):414-25.
20. Priebe HJ. Cricoid pressure: an alternative view. Semin Anesth Per Med Pain. 2005;24(2):120-6.
21. Wraight WJ, Chamney AR, Howells TH. The determination of an effective cricoid pressure. Anaesthesia. 1983;38(5):461-6.
22. Clayton TJ, Vanner RG. A novel method of measuring cricoid force. Anaesthesia 2002;57(4):326-9.
How to Cite
1.
John Jairo Páez L., J. Ricardo Navarro V. Controversial issue of cricoid pressure or Sellick maneuver. Colomb. J. Anesthesiol. [Internet]. 2010 Jul. 1 [cited 2024 Apr. 20];38(3):377-83. Available from: https://www.revcolanest.com.co/index.php/rca/article/view/669

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2010-07-01
How to Cite
1.
John Jairo Páez L., J. Ricardo Navarro V. Controversial issue of cricoid pressure or Sellick maneuver. Colomb. J. Anesthesiol. [Internet]. 2010 Jul. 1 [cited 2024 Apr. 20];38(3):377-83. Available from: https://www.revcolanest.com.co/index.php/rca/article/view/669
Section
Essay

Altmetric

Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views
QR Code