Plagiarism and Other Literary Missteps in Medicine and Particularly in Anesthesia

  • J. Antonio Aldrete Departamento de Anestesiología de la Universidad de Alabama, en Birmingham, Estados Unidos. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Academia Nacional de Medicina de Buenos Aires. Fundación Arachnoiditis, Birmingham, USA.
Keywords: Plagiarism, intellectual property, copyright, authorship, theft

Abstract

Recently, with the great abundance of publications, a noticeable number of scientific papers that have been previously published partially or in whole, by other author or authors have appeared demonstrating plagiarism. When either a paragraph or complete article is reproduced, it is considered that the content has been stolen from the author and the original publication. Different degrees and varieties of plagiarism have been defined, and even “auto plagiarism” has been defined which is not so alarming. However, including more than 6 exact consecutive words from another text written by other author should be considered plagiarism. Once identified and checked, several medical journals and scientific organizations have sanctioned plagiarism in different ways; in some countries plagiarism is not even considered a crime and it is simply assumed as a conceptual problem. However, in other countries, in some universities, and medical organizations, it has been sanctioned with the retraction of the published paper, and notification of the plagiarist’s employer (for example the University, hospital, government agency and scientific or trade organization). Commonly, the punishment is the retraction of the paper in the journal, dismissal of the plagiarist from the academic center (University) and or destitution in one or more appointments he may have had. Maybe in the future, fines or lawsuits resulting in economic compensation to the original author could be instated. Another issue is the responsibility of editors who allow such actions, particularly if it is a common event.

References

1. Caon M. Plagiarism in scientific/medical physics publishing. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2007;30: xi-xii.
2. Ramaswamy M. It is not just the work--it is also the words. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2007;11:169-72.
3. Guidelines on good publications practice. Committee on Publications Ethics (COPE). Br J Biomed Surg. 2000;57:2-6.
4. Butler D. Entire-paper plagiarism caught by software. Nature. 2008;455:715.
5. Sox HC, Rennie D. Research misconduct, retraction, and cleansing the medical literature: lessons from the Poehlman case. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144: 609-13.
6. Office of Research Integrity (ORI). Policies: ORI policy on plagiarism [internet]. Rockville, MD; 1994 [citado: 8 diciembre 2008]. Disponible en: www.ori.Dhhs.gov/policies/plagiarism.shtml.
7. Arabi YM. Scientific misconduct and medical publishing. Ann Thorac Med. 2007;2:147.
8. Mello MM, Brennan TA. Due process in investigations of research misconduct. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1280-6.
9. Al-Muharraqui MA, Fedorowicz Z. Plariagism – Part 11: Finding and dealing with a Fraudster. Bahrain Med Bull. 2009;31:1-4.
10. Peh WC, Arokiasamy J. Plagiarism: a joint statement from the Singapore Medical Journal and the Medical Journal of Malaysia. Singapore Med J. 2008;63: 965-6.
11. Lindey A. Plagiarism and originality. Westport, CT; Greenwood Publishing; 1974.
12. Skandalakis JE, Mirilas P. Plagiarism. Arch Surg. 2004;139:1022-24.
13. Bretag T, Mahmud S. Self-plagiarism or appropriate textual re-use? J Acad Ethics. 2009;7:193-205.
14. White C. Suspected research fraud: difficulties of getting at the truth. BMJ. 2005;331:281-8.
15. Smith R. Investigating the previous studies of a fraudulent author. BMJ. 2005;331:288-91.
16. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Public Health Service policies on research misconduct: final rule. Fed Regist. 2005;70:28369- 400.
17. Kennedy D. Editorial expression of concern. Science. 2006;311:36.
18. Shaffer SL. Editorial notice of retraction. Anesth Analg. 2010;110:1350.
19. Neligan P, Williams N, Greenblatt E, et al. Retraction letter for Neligan P, Malhotra G, Fraser MW, Williams N, Greenblatt EP, Cereda M, Ochroch EA. Noninvasive ventilation immediately after extubation improves lung function in morbidly obese patients with obstructive sleep apnea undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Anesthesia & Analgesia 2010;110:1360-5. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:576.
20. Struys MM, Fechner J, Schüttler J, et al. Requested retraction of six studies on the PK/PD and tolerability of fospropofol. Anesth Analg. 2010;110:1240.
21. Marcus A. Massive breach of trust. Anesthesiol News. 2010;24-8.
22. Noble DW. Preventing scientific fraud. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:472.
23. Lowes R. Anesthesiologist sentenced to 6 months for faked research. MedScape Today. [Sin lugar]; 29 junio 2010.
24. Rosoff PM. Industrial collaboration. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:863-4.
25. Rojas Chavarro MA, Olarte Collazos JM. Plagio en el ámbito académico. Rev Col Anesth. 2010;38:537-8.
26. Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. What is accountability in health care? Ann Inter Med. 1996;124:229-39.
27. Wends DA. Our view: Gifts from drugmakers damage doctors’ integrity. USA Today [internet]. 8 febrero 2006 [citado: 15 febrero 2011]. Disponible en: http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2006-02-07-our-medical-ethics_x.htm.
28. Mychaskiw G 2nd, Badr AE, Calimaran AM. Ethics, marketing and the medical literature. Anesth Analg. 2006;103:488.
29. Stossel TP. Regulating academic-industrial relationships- solving problems or stifling progress? N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1060-5.
30. Elliot C, Landa AS. Commentary: What’s wrong with _ ghostwriting? Bioethics. 2010;24:284-6.
How to Cite
1.
Aldrete JA. Plagiarism and Other Literary Missteps in Medicine and Particularly in Anesthesia. Colomb. J. Anesthesiol. [Internet]. 2011 Apr. 1 [cited 2024 Apr. 20];39(2):217-29. Available from: https://www.revcolanest.com.co/index.php/rca/article/view/751

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2011-04-01
How to Cite
1.
Aldrete JA. Plagiarism and Other Literary Missteps in Medicine and Particularly in Anesthesia. Colomb. J. Anesthesiol. [Internet]. 2011 Apr. 1 [cited 2024 Apr. 20];39(2):217-29. Available from: https://www.revcolanest.com.co/index.php/rca/article/view/751
Section
Essay

Altmetric

Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views
QR Code

Some similar items: