Radial artery catheterism for invasive monitoring: Preventing complications, a challenge in anesthesia
Abstract
Introduction: Radial artery line placement is a common intervention in anesthesia. There is a sensation of false safety generated by the relatively low complication incidence. Identification of the primary association factors and controversies on the matter are key for prevention of complications.
Methods: We present the case of a female patient who suffered permanent ischemia in her hand after inserting a catheter in the radial artery. A reflexive review of the literature on risk factors and controversies on interventions that have been implemented is included.
Results: Placing a line in the radial artery may cause permanent ischemic injuries in as much as 0.09% of cases. 38% of cases develop thrombosis with the procedure, the risk of thrombosis increases over time and remains even after removing the cannula. The Allen test has shown to be a poor predictor of ischemic lesions. Age, use of tobacco, diabetes, renal failure and arterial hypertension are all risk factors for radial artery atheromatosis. Other elements such as the size and the material the catheter is made of, have also been related to the risk of complications. Infusions through the catheter remain a controversy. Ultrasound guides for catheterism eases the procedure.
Conclusions: This procedure is definitely not without risks. Even though many factors have been carefully documented they cannot be fully controlled and interventions aimed at prevention have not been proven to be effective.
References
2. Bowdle TA. Complications of invasive monitoring. Anesthesiol Clin North America. 2002;20:571-88.
3. Scheer BV, Perel A, Pfeiffer UJ. Clinical Review: Complications and risk factor of peripheral arterial cathetes used for haemodynamic monitoring in anaesthesia and intensive care medicine. Critical Care. 2002;6:198-204.
4. Bedford RF, Wollman H. Comparison of percutaneous radial artery cannulation: an objective, prospective study in man. Anesthesiology. 1973;38:228-36.
5. Slogoff S, Keats AS, Arlund C. On the safety of radial artery cannulation. Anesthesiology. 1983;59:42-7.
6. Barone JE, Madlinger RV. Should an Allen test be performed before radial artery cannulation?. J Trauma. 2006;61:468-70.
7. Chowdhury UK, Airan B, Mishra PK, Kothari SS, Subramaniam GK, Ray R, et al. Histopathology and morphometry of radial artery conduits: basic study and clinical application. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78:1614-21.
8. Coulter TD, Wiedemann HP. Complications of hemodynamic monitoring. Clin Chest Med. 1999;20:2.
9. Bedford RF. Percutaneous radial artery cannulation increased safety using teflon catheters. Anesthesiology. 1975;42:219-22.
10. Bedford RF. Radial arterial function following percutaneouscannulation with 18 and 20 gauge catheters. Anesthesiology. 1977;47:37-9.
11. Gerber DR, Zeifman CWE, Khouli HI, Dib H, Pratter MR. Comparison of wire-guided and nonwire-guided radial artery catheters. Chest. 1996;109:761-4.
12. Mangar D, Thrush DN, Connell GR, Downs JB. Direct or modified seldinger guide wire-directed for arterial catheter insertion. Anesth Analg. 1993;76:714-7.
13. Ohara Y, Nakayama S, Furukawa H, Satoh Y, Suzuki H, Yanai H. Use of a wire-guided cannula for radial arterial cannulation. J Anesth. 2007;21:83-5.
14. Randolph AG, Cook DJ, Gonzalez CA, Andrew M. Benefit of heparin in peripheral venous and arterial catheters: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 1998;316:969-75.
15. Tuncali BE, Kuvaki B, Tuncali B, Capar E. A comparison of the efficacy of heparinized and nonheparinized solution for maintenance of perioperative radial arterial catheter patency and subsequent occlusion. Anesth Analg. 2005;100:1117-21.
16. del Cotillo M, Grane N, Llavoré M, Quintana S. Heparinized solution vs. saline solution in the maintenance of arterial catheters: a double blind randomized clinical trial. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34:339-43.
17. Levin PD, Sheinin O, Gozal Y. Use of ultrasound guidance in the insertion of radial artery catheters. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:481-4.
18. Troianos CA, Hartman GS, Glas KE, Skubas NJ, Eberhardt RT, Walker JD, et al. Guidelines for performing ultrasound guided vascular cannulation: recommendations of the American society of echocardiography and the society of cardiovascular anesthesiologists. Anesth Analg. 2012;114:46-72.
19. McCormack LJ, Cauldwell EW, Anson BJ. Brachial and antebrachial arterial patterns; a study of 750 extremities. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1953;96:43-54.
20. Brzezinski M, Luisetti T, London MJ. Radial artery cannulation: a comprehensive review of recent anatomic and physiologic investigations. Anesth Analg. 2009;109:1763-81.
21. Valentine RJ, Modrall JG, Clagett GP. Hand ischemia after radial cannulation. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201:18-22.
22. Steven G, Wallac H. Cannulation injury of the radial artery: diagnosis and treatment algorithm. Am J Crit Care. 2004;13:315-9.
23. Lee ML, Lee IO, Kong MH. Surgical treatment of digital ischemia occurred after radial artery catheterization. J Korean Med Sci. 2001;16:375-7.
24. Peterson LH, Dripps RD, Risman GC. A method for recording the arterial pressure pulse and blood pressure in man. Am Heart J. 1949;37:771-82.
Downloads
Altmetric
Article metrics | |
---|---|
Abstract views | |
Galley vies | |
PDF Views | |
HTML views | |
Other views |