Variability of anesthetic depth in total intravenous anesthesia vs balanced anesthesia using entropy indices: a randomized, crossover, controlled clinical trial

  • Henry Oliveros Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la Sabana, Chía, Colombia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7632-906X
  • Fernando Ríos a. Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la Sabana, Chía, Colombia. b. Clínica Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia.
  • Daniel A. Botero-Rosas Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la Sabana, Chía, Colombia
  • Sandra C. Quiroga Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la Sabana, Chía, Colombia
  • Freddy C. Cifuentes Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la Sabana, Chía, Colombia
  • Gloria A. Rodríguez Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la Sabana, Chía, Colombia
  • María P. Morales Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la Sabana, Chía, Colombia
Keywords: Entropy, Intraoperative Awakening, Anesthesia, Propofol, Sevoflurane, Cross Over Clinical Trials

Abstract

Introduction: Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and balanced anesthesia (BA) are the most commonly used anesthetic techniques. The differences are the variability of the depth of anesthesia between these techniques that might predict which one is safer for patients and presents a lower risk of intraoperative 
awakening.

Objective: To determine whether a difference exists in the variability of depth of anesthesia obtained by response entropy (RE). 

Methods: A crossover clinical trial was conducted on 20 healthy patients receiving upper or lower limb ambulatory orthopedic surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to (a) target-controlled infusion of propofol using the Schnider model at a target concentration of 2.5mg/mL for 15minutes and a 10-minute washout, followed by sevoflurane administration at 0.8 minimal alveolar concentration (MAC) for the reminder of the surgery, or (b) the reverse sequence. Differences in the variability of the depth of anesthesia using RE were evaluated using paired t test.

Results: The treatment effect showed no significant difference in the average values of RE, during TIVA=97.23 vs BA 97.04 (P=0.39). Carry Over (-4.98 vs 4.08) and Period (100.3 vs 94.68) effects were not significantly different.

Conclusion: The present study suggests that both anesthetic techniques are equivalent in terms of the stability of the depth of anesthesia. It is important to keep testing the determinants of the efficacy of different populations because the individual behaviors of patients might ultimately tip the scale.

References

1. Ghoneim MM, Block RI, Haffarnan M, et al. Awareness during anesthesia: risk factors, causes and sequelae: a review of reported cases in the literature. Anesth Analg 2009;108:527–535.

2. Samuelsson P, Brudin L, Sandin RH. Late psychological symptoms after awareness among consecutively included surgical patients. Anesthesiology 2007;106:26–32.

3. Bruchas RR, Kent CD, Wilson HD, et al. Anesthesia awareness: narrative review of psychological sequelae, treatment, and incidence. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 2011;18:257–267.

4. Lora Quintana CG, Navarro Vargas JR. Awakening and recall of events in patients under general anesthesia. Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology 2000;28:1–11.

5. Ghoneim MM. Incidence of and risk factors for awareness during anaesthesia. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2007; 21:327–343.

6. Tasbihgou SR, Vogels MF, Absalom AR. Accidental awareness during general anaesthesia—a narrative review. Anaesthesia 2018;73:112–122.

7. Rampil IJ. A primer for EEG signal processing in anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1998;89:980–1002.

8. Landers R, Wen P, Pather S. Depth of anaesthesia: measuring or guessing? 2010 IEEE Int Conf Nano/Molecular Med Eng IEEE NANOMED 2010. 2010;76-81. DOI: 10.1109/NANOMED. 2010.5749809

9. Vakkuri A, Yli-hankala A, Talja P, et al. Time-frequency balanced spectral entropy as a measure of anesthetic drug effect in central nervous system during sevoflurane, propofol, and thiopental anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2004;48:145–153.

10. Struys MM, Jensen EW, Smith W, et al. Performance of the ARXderived auditory evoked potential index as an indicator of anesthetic depth: a comparison with bispectral index and hemodynamic measures during propofol administration. Anesthesiology 2002;96:803–816.

11. Schmidt GN, Bischoff P, Standl T, et al. Comparative evaluation of the Datex-Ohmeda S/5 entropy module and the Bispectral Index® monitor during propofol-remifentanil anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2004;101:1283–1290.

12. Hasak L, Wujtewicz M, Owczuk R. Assessment of the depth of anaesthesia during inhalational and intravenous induction of general anaesthesia. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 2014;46:274–279.

13. Myles PS, Leslie K, McNeil J, et al. Bispectral index monitoring to prevent awareness during anaesthesia: the B-aware randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2004;363:1757–1763.

14. Viertiö-Oja H. Description of the EntropyTM algorithmas applied in the Datex-Ohmeda S/5TM Entropy Module. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2004;48:154–161.

15. Schmidt GN, Bischoff P, Standl T, et al. Comparative evaluation of the Datex–Ohmeda S/5 Entropy Module and the Bispectral Index monitor during propofol-remifentanil anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2004;101:1283–1290.

16. Espí C, Vila P, Muñoz S, et al. Comparison of the bispectral index and spectral entropy in gynecological surgery. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 2005;8:459–465.

17. Wheeler P, Hoffman WE, Baughman VL, et al. Response entropy increases during painful stimulation. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2005;17:86–90.

18. NICE. Depth of anaesthesia monitors-Bispectr Bispectral Inde al Index (BIS), E-Entrop x (BIS), E-Entropy and y and Narcotrend-Compact M Narcotrend-Compact M. Diagnostics guidance. 2012;National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, [Cited 2018 Jan 30]. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/dg6/resources/depth-of-anaesthesia-monitors-bispectral-index-bis-eentropy-and-narcotrendcompact-m-pdf-29275661509.

19. Julious SA, Campbell MJ, Altman DG. Estimating sample sizes for continuous, binary, and ordinal outcomes in paired comparisons: practical hints. J Biopharm Stat 1999;9:241–251.

20. Mosquera-Dussan OL, Botero-Rosas DA, Cagy M, et al. Nonlinear analysis of the electroencephalogram in depth of anesthesia. Rev Fac Ing 2015;1:45–56.

21. El Hor T, Van Der Linden P, De Hert S, et al. Impact of entropy monitoring on volatile anesthetic uptake. Anesthesiology 2013;118:868–873.

22. Gorban V, Shchegolev AKD. Entropy monitoring during low-flow inhalation anesthesia—a tribute to fashion or necessity? Anesteziol Reanimatol 2016;61:95–100.

23. Shepherd J, Jones J, Frampton GK, et al. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of depth of anaesthesia monitoring (E-Entropy, Bispectral Index and Narcotrend): a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2013;17:1–264.
How to Cite
1.
Oliveros H, Ríos F, Botero-Rosas DA, Quiroga SC, Cifuentes FC, Rodríguez GA, Morales MP. Variability of anesthetic depth in total intravenous anesthesia vs balanced anesthesia using entropy indices: a randomized, crossover, controlled clinical trial. Colomb. J. Anesthesiol. [Internet]. 2020Jul.1 [cited 2020Nov.27];48(3):111-7. Available from: https://www.revcolanest.com.co/index.php/rca/article/view/900

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2020-07-01
How to Cite
1.
Oliveros H, Ríos F, Botero-Rosas DA, Quiroga SC, Cifuentes FC, Rodríguez GA, Morales MP. Variability of anesthetic depth in total intravenous anesthesia vs balanced anesthesia using entropy indices: a randomized, crossover, controlled clinical trial. Colomb. J. Anesthesiol. [Internet]. 2020Jul.1 [cited 2020Nov.27];48(3):111-7. Available from: https://www.revcolanest.com.co/index.php/rca/article/view/900
Section
Original

Most read articles by the same author(s)