Multi-injection vs. single injection technique with localization of the medial nerve for infraclavicular block for upper limb surgery

  • Reinaldo Grueso Angulo Departamento de Anestesiología. Hospital Universitario San Ignacio. Profesor asistente, Facultad de Medicina Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Bogotá, Colombia
  • Alejandra Sanín Hoyos Anestesióloga/o Hospital Universitario de San Ignacio, Profesor(a) Instructor(a), Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
  • Antonio J. Bonilla Ramírez Anestesióloga/o Hospital Universitario de San Ignacio, Profesor(a) Instructor(a), Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
  • Andrés García Carreño Anestesiólogo Hospital Universitario de San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia
  • Javier Cubillos Salcedo Anestesiólogo Hospital Universitario de San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia
Keywords: Regional anesthesia, nerve block, infraclavicular block, brachial plexus

Abstract

Introduction. The purpose of this, randomized, controlled, observer-blind clinical trial, was to compare the efficacy of the neurostimulator-guid-ed infraclavicular block of the brachial plexus, using two different techniques: multiple injection with localization of three different cords and the single injection technique with localization of the medial cord.

Methods. Two hundred and sixty (260) pa-tients scheduled for upper limb surgery under regional anesthesia were randomly distributed into two groups: multiple injection (MI) (129) or single injection (SI) (128). The primary out-come assessed was the efficacy of the block, meaning the absence of sedation beyond some established margins or the need to administer general anesthesia. Other outcomes measured were patient satisfaction and the presence of side effects.

Results. Both groups had comparable baseline characteristics. The time for administering the block was 9,6 minutes (±5,9) for SI vs. 10,4 min-utes (±3,8) for MI, which was not clinically differ-ent. The primary outcome showed 7 failures in 129 MI patients (5,43 %) and 27 (21,09 %) of the SI 128 patients studied. This difference between the two techniques results in a RR of 3,89 with a CI (1,76 - 8,6) and p< 0,0002.

Conclusions. In a significant sample of pa-tients and within a controlled environment, the effectiveness of the brachial plexus block using the conventional multiple injections technique with peripheral nerve stimulator was superior to stimulator-guided peripheral nerve single in-jection technique with localization of the medial cord.

References

1. Gerancher JC., Upper extremity nerve blocks. Anesthesiology Clinics of North America. 2000; 14 (2): 297-319.
2. Hadzic A, Vloka JD., Infraclavicular brachial plexus block, en Peripheral Nerve Blocks. McGraw-Hill, New York; 2004. Páginas 131-140.
3. Raj PP., Montgomery SJ., nettles d et al. Infraclavicular brachial plexus block : a new approach. Anest Analg 1973; 52: 897-904.
4. Rodriguez J., Bárcena M., Restricted infraclavicular distribution of the local anesthetic solution after Infraclavicular brachial plexus block. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. 2003; 28 (1): 33-36.
5. Wilson JL., Brown DL., Wong GY., et al. Infraclavicular braquial plexus block: parasagital anatomy important to the coracoide technique. Anesth Analg 1998; 87: 870-3.
6. Sandhu N., Capan L., Ultrasound-guided Infraclavicular brachial plexus block. Br J Aneaesth, 2002; 89: 254-9.
7. Borgeat A., Ekatodramis G., dumont ch. An evaluation of the infraclavicular block via a modified approach of the Raj technique. Anesth Analg 2001; 93: 436-441.
8. Gaertner E., Estebe J.P., Infraclavicular plexus Block: Multiple injection versus single injection.Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine.2002; 27,(6): 590-594.
9. Rodriguez J, Bárcena M. A Comparison Of Single versus Multiple Injections on the extent of Anesthesia witn Coracoid Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block. Anesth Analg 2004; 99: 1225-30.
10. Rodriguez J., Taboada-Muñiz M . Median Versus Musculocutaneous Nerve Response with SingleInjection Infraclavicular Coracoid Block. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 2004; Vol 29, No 6 (November-December),: 534-538.
11. Rodriguez J., Bárcenas M., Increased Success Rate with Infraclavicular Brachia Plexus Block Using a Dual Injection Technique. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia , 2004; 16: 251-256.
12. Wiffler K.,. Coracoid block: a safe and easy technique. Br J Anaesth 1981: 53: 845-48.
13. Rodriguez J., Bárcenas M., Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block Effects on respiratory function and extent of the block. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 1998; 23(6): 564-568.
How to Cite
1.
Grueso Angulo R, Sanín Hoyos A, Bonilla Ramírez AJ, García Carreño A, Cubillos Salcedo J. Multi-injection vs. single injection technique with localization of the medial nerve for infraclavicular block for upper limb surgery . Colomb. J. Anesthesiol. [Internet]. 2010 Jan. 1 [cited 2024 May 7];38(1):22-3. Available from: https://www.revcolanest.com.co/index.php/rca/article/view/304

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2010-01-01
How to Cite
1.
Grueso Angulo R, Sanín Hoyos A, Bonilla Ramírez AJ, García Carreño A, Cubillos Salcedo J. Multi-injection vs. single injection technique with localization of the medial nerve for infraclavicular block for upper limb surgery . Colomb. J. Anesthesiol. [Internet]. 2010 Jan. 1 [cited 2024 May 7];38(1):22-3. Available from: https://www.revcolanest.com.co/index.php/rca/article/view/304
Section
Original

Altmetric

Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views
QR Code