Etilefrine vs. phenylephrine for hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: Multicenter, randomized, double blind controlled clinical trial

  • Diana Bolaños-Arboleda Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellín, Colombia
  • Nelson Javier Fonseca-Ruiz Anesthesiologist, Intensivist, Master of Clinical Epidemiology, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellín, Colombia
  • Nury Isabel Socha-García Anesthesiologist, Maternal and Child Health Unit, Clínica Universitaria
  • Edward Garáa-Peñuela Anestesiólogo, Clínica del Prado, Medellín, Colombia
  • Germán Monsalve-Mejía Anestesiólogo, Clínica del Prado, Medellín, Colombia

Abstract

Introduction: Hypotension after spinal anesthesia in cesarean section should be minimized. The use of vasopressors is an effective measure to treat hypotension. The objective of this paper is to compare the safety and effectiveness of etilefrine vs. phenylephrine in the management of this condition.

Methods: This multicenter, double-blind trial between August 2009 and November 2010 included 196 patients with hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery; the patients were randomized to receive etilefrine or phenylephrine as vasopressor. The primary outcome was the fetal umbilical arterial pH. The secondary outcomes were: fetal acidosis (umbilical arterial pH < 7.20), Apgar score at 1 and 5 min, need for intubation and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit for newborns, and time of hypotension, total dose of vasopressor, atropine requirement, intravenous fluids volume and incidence of nausea and vomiting in mothers.

Results: 98 patients received etilefrine and 98 phenylephrine. There were no differences in umbilical arterial pH (7.27 vs. 7.28, respectively, = 0.493). The total dose of vasopressor (5.66 vs. 6.51ml, respectively, = 0.024) and total time of hypotension (2.78 vs. 3.25 min, respectively, = 0.021) were lower in the etilefrine group. Other outcomes studied showed no statistically significant differences.

Conclusion: Etilefrine and phenylephrine are equally effective for the treatment of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. This study found no difference in the maternal or fetal outcomes.

 

References

1. Tsen, Lawrence C. Anesthesia for cesarean delivery. In: 60th Annual meeting of the American Society of Anesthesiologists. American Society of Anesthesiologists; 2009. p. 1-6.
2. Awkins JL, Koonin LM, Palmer SK, Gibbs CP. Anesthesia-related deaths during obstetric delivery in the United States, 1979-1990. Anesthesiology. 1997;86:277-84.
3. Páez J, Navarro J. Anestesia regional versus general para parto por cesárea. Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2012;40:203-6.
4. Mercier FJ, Auge M, Hoffmann C, Fischer C, Le Gouez A. Maternal hypotension during spinal anesthesia for caesarean delivery. Minerva Anestesiol. 2013;79:62-73.
5. Loubert C. Fluid and vasopressor management for Cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia: continuing professional development. Can J Anaesth. 2012;59:604-19.
6. Nag DS, Samaddar DP, Chatterjee A, Kumar H, Dembla A. Vasopressors in obstetric anesthesia: a current perspective. World J Clin Cases. 2015;3:58-64.
7. Birnbach D, Browne I. Anesthesia for obstetrics. In: Miller R, editor. Miller's anesthesia. 7th ed. San Francisco: Elsevier; 2009.
8. Roberts SW, Leveno KJ, Sidawi JE, Lucas MJ, Kelly MA. Fetal academia associated with regional anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;85:79-83.
9. Cooper DW. Caesarean delivery vasopressor management. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2012;25:300-8.
10. Banerjee A, Stocche RM, Angle P, Halpern SH. Preload or coload for spinal anesthesia for elective Cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2010;57:24-31.
11. Mueller MD, Brühwiler H, Schüpfer GK, Lüscher KP. Higher rate of fetal acidemia after regional anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90:131-4.
12. Cooper DW, Carpenter M, Mowbray P, Desira WR, Ryall DM, Kokri MS. Fetal and maternal effects of phenylephrine and ephedrine during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology. 2002;97:1582-90.
13. Wright RG, Shnider SM, Levinson G, Rolbin SH, Parer JT. The effect of maternal administration of ephedrine on fetal heart rate and variability. Obstet Gynecol. 1981;57:734-8.
14. Ngan Kee WD, Khaw KS, Tan PE, Ng FF, Karmakar MK. Placental transfer and fetal metabolic effects of phenylephrine and ephedrine during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology. 2009;111:506-12.
15. Veeser M, Hofmann T, Roth R, Klohr S, Rossaint R, Heesen M. Vasopressors for the management of hypotension after spinal anesthesia for elective caesarean section. Systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;56:810-6.
16. Marrugo J, Granados L, Marrugo J. Líquidos y vasopresores en prevención y manejo de hipotensión inducida por anestesia espinal durante cesárea programada en mujeres colombianas. Rev Cienc Biomed. 2014;5:263-71.
17. Rásánen J, Alahuhta S, Kangas-Saarela T, Jouppila R, Jouppila P. The effects of ephedrine and etilefrine on uterine and fetal blood flow and on fetal myocardial function during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 1991;1:3-8.
18. Lucas DN, Yentis SM, Kinsella SM, Holdcroft A, May AE, Wee M, et al. Urgency of caesarean section: a new classification. J R Soc Med. 2000;93:346-50.
19. Halaszynski TM, Juda R, Silverman DG. Optimizing postoperative outcomes with efficient preoperative assessment and management. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:S76-86.
20. Montoya BH, Oliveros CI, Moreno DA. Managing hypotension induced by spinal anesthesia for caesarean section. Rev Col Anest Mayo-Julio. 2009;37:131-40.
21. Mercier FJ. Fluid loading for cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia: have we studied all the options? Anesth Analg. 2011;113:677-80.
22. Mercier FJ. Cesarean delivery fluid management. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2012;25:286-91.
23. Cluver C, Novikova N, Hofmeyr GJ, Hall DR. Maternal position during caesarean section for preventing maternal and neonatal complications. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007623. pub3. Issue 3. Art. No.: CD007623.
24. Calvache JA, Muñoz MF, Baron FJ. Hemodynamic effects of a right lumbar pelvic wedge during spinal anesthesia for caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2011;20:307-11.
25. Biddle C. To press or not to press, and if so, with what? A single question-focused meta-analysis of vasopressor choice during regional anesthesia in obstetrics. AANA J. 2013;81:261-4.
26. Malin GL, Morris RK, Khan KS. Strength of association between umbilical cord pH and perinatal and long term outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2010;340:c1471.
27. Belzarena SD. Ephedrine and etilefrine as vasopressor to correct maternal arterial hypotension during elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Comparative study. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2006;56:223-9.
28. Valli J, Pirhonen J, Aantaa R, Erkkola R, Kanto J. The effects of regional anaesthesia for caesarean section on maternal and fetal blood flow velocities measured by Doppler ultrasound. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1994;38:165-9.
29. Prakash S, Pramanik V, Chellani H, Salhan S, Gogia AR. Maternal and neonatal effects of bolus administration of ephedrine and phenylephrine during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery: a randomized study. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2010;19:24-30.
30. Magalhães E, Govêia CS, de Araújo Ladeira LC, Nascimento BG, Kluthcouski SM. Ephedrine versus phenylephrine: prevention of hypotension during spinal block for cesarean section and effects on the fetus. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2009;59:11-20.
31. Casey BM, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ. The continuing value of the Apgar score for the assessment of newborn infants. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:467-71.
32. Doherty A, Ohashi Y, Downey K, Carvalho JC. Phenylephrine infusion versus bolus regimens during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia: a double-blind randomized clinical trial to assess hemodynamic changes. Anesth Analg. 2012;115:1343-50.
33. Ngan Kee WD. Phenylephrine infusions for maintaining blood pressure during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: finding the shoe that fits. Anesth Analg. 2014;118:496-8.
34. Tanaka M, Balki M, Parkes RK, Carvalho JC. ED95 of phenylephrine to prevent spinal-induced hypotension and/or nausea at elective cesarean delivery. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2009;18:125-30.
35. George RB, McKeen D, Columb MO, Habib AS. Up-down determination of the 90% effective dose of phenylephrine for the treatment of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2010;110:154-8.
36. Habib AS. A review of the impact of phenylephrine administration on maternal hemodynamics and maternal and neonatal outcomes in women undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2012;114:377-90.
37. Pierce ET, Carr DB, Datta S. Effects of ephedrine and phenylephrine on maternal and fetal atrial natriuretic peptide levels during elective cesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1994;38:48-51.
38. LaPorta RF, Arthur GR, Datta S. Phenylephrine in treating maternal hypotension due to spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery: effects on neonatal catecholamine concentrations, acid base status and Apgar scores. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1995;39:901-5.
39. Ngan Kee WD, Khaw KS, Ng FF. Comparison of phenylephrine infusion regimens for maintaining maternal blood pressure during spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section. Br J Anaesth. 2004;92:469-74.
40. Thomas DG, Robson SC, Redfern N, Hughes D, Boys RJ. Randomized trial of bolus phenylephrine or ephedrine for maintenance of arterial pressure during spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section. Br J Anaesth. 1996;76:61-5.
How to Cite
1.
Bolaños-Arboleda D, Fonseca-Ruiz NJ, Socha-García NI, Garáa-Peñuela E, Monsalve-Mejía G. Etilefrine vs. phenylephrine for hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: Multicenter, randomized, double blind controlled clinical trial. Colomb. J. Anesthesiol. [Internet]. 2016Apr.1 [cited 2021May12];44(2):89–96. Available from: https://www.revcolanest.com.co/index.php/rca/article/view/449

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2016-04-01
How to Cite
1.
Bolaños-Arboleda D, Fonseca-Ruiz NJ, Socha-García NI, Garáa-Peñuela E, Monsalve-Mejía G. Etilefrine vs. phenylephrine for hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: Multicenter, randomized, double blind controlled clinical trial. Colomb. J. Anesthesiol. [Internet]. 2016Apr.1 [cited 2021May12];44(2):89–96. Available from: https://www.revcolanest.com.co/index.php/rca/article/view/449
Section
Original