The Role of the Systematic Reviews in Evidence-based Anesthesiology

1. Porta M, editor. A dictionary of epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.
2. Haynes B. Conducting systematic reviews. En: Haynes RB, Sackett DL, Guyatt GH, et al. Clinical epidemiology: how to do clinical practice research. 3rd edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006. Chapter 2.
3. Clarke M. Can you believe what you read in the papers? Trials. 2009;10:55.
4. Tricco AC, Tetzlaff J, Moher D. The art and science of knowledge synthesis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:11-20.
5. Jüni P, Witschi A, Bloch R, et al. The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis. JAMA. 1999;282:1054-60.
6. Jüni P, Altman DG, Egger M. Systematic reviews in health care: assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ. 2001;323:42-6.
7. Hróbjartsson A, Forfang E, Haahr MT, et al. Blinded trials taken to the test: an analysis of randomized clinical trials that report tests for the success of blinding. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36:654-63.
8. Higgins JPT, Green S (Ed). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. Marzo 2011. [internet] [Consultado: marzo 2011]. Disponible en: www.cochrane-handbook.org.
9. Bero L, Oostvogel F, Bacchetti P, et al. Factors associated with findings of published trials of drug-drug comparisons: why some statins appear more efficacious than others. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e184.
10. Lexchin J, Bero LA, Djulbegovic B, et al. Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review. BMJ. 2003;326:1167-70.
11. Van Luijn JC, van Loenen AC, Gribnau FW, et al. Choice of comparator in active control trials of new drugs. Ann Pharmacother. 2008;42:1605-12.
12. Sutton AJ, Higgins JP. Recent developments in meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2008;27:625-50.
13. Chan AW, Hróbjartsson A, Haahr MT, et al. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. JAMA. 2004;291:2457-65.
14. Dwan K, Altman DG, Arnaiz JA, et al. Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias. PLoS One. 2008;3:e3081.
15. Parekh-Bhurke S, Kwok CS, Pang C, et al. Uptake of methods to deal with publication bias in systematic reviews has increased over time, but there is still much scope for improvement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:349-57.
16. Song F, Parekh-Bhurke S, Hooper L, et al. Extent of publication bias in different categories of research cohorts: a meta-analysis of empirical studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:79.
17. Schulman SR, Schardt C, Erb TO. Evidence-based medicine in anesthesiology. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2002;15:661-8.
18. Felson DT. Bias in meta-analytic research. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:885-92.
19. Pedersen T, Möller AM, Cracknell J. The mission of the Cochrane anesthesia review group: preparing and disseminating Systematic Reviews of the effect of health care in anesthesiology. Anesth Analg. 2002;95:1012-8.
20. Smith AF, Pittaway AJ. Premedication for anxiety in adult day surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;3:CD002192.
21. Carlisle J, Stevenson CA. Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;3:CD004125.
22. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting Systematic Reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700.
23. Balshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann HJ, et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:401-6.