Random Error, Bias and Fraud in Scientific Publications
References
1. Miller DR. Towards enhanced transparency and accuracy of scientific reporting in biomedical journals. Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2012;40:1-3.
2. Franzen M, Rodder S, Weingart P. Fraud: causes and culprits as perceived by science and the media. Institutional changes, rather than individual motivations, encourage misconduct. EMBO Rep. 2007;8:3-7.
3. Steen RG. Misinformation in the medical literature: what role do error and fraud play? J Med Ethics. 2011;37:498-503.
4. Steen RG. Retractions in the medical literature: how many patients are put at risk by flawed research? J Med Ethics. 2011;37:688-92.
5. Steen RG. Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud? J Med Ethics. 2011;37:113-7.
6. Sackett DL. Bias in analytic research. J Chronic Dis. 1979;32:51-63.
7. Rothman K, Greenland S. Modern epidemiology. 2nd edition ed. Rothman K, Greenland S, editors. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1998. 79-91.
8. Buzzelli DE. The Definition of Misconduct in Science: A View from NSF. Science. 1993;259:584-648.
9. Aldrete JA. Plagio y otros traspasos literario-cientificos en medicina y particularmente en anestesiologia. Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2011;39:217-29.
10. Gonzalez Sandoval DC. Plagio: Una problematica de la mente humana. Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2011;39:271.
11. Rojas Chavarro MN, Olarte Collazos JM. Plagio en el ambito academico. Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2010;38:537-8.
12. Nylenna M, Andersen D, Dahlquist G, Sarvas M, Aakvaag A. Handling of scientific dishonesty in the Nordic countries. National Committees on Scientific Dishonesty in the Nordic Countries. Lancet. 1999;354:57-61.
13. Carlisle JB. The analysis of 169 randomised controlled trials to test data integrity. Anaesthesia. 2012;doi:10.1111/j.1365- 2044.2012.07-128.x
14. Marcus A. German Medical Board Issues Sweeping Findings in Boldt Case. Ninety studies implicated in probe, might require retraction. Anesthesiology News, The independent monthly newspaper for anesthesiologists. 2011; February 14. Available in http://m.anesthesiologynews.com/Article.aspx?d=Web+Exclusives&d_id=175&i=February+2011&i_id=702&a_id=16596. Accesed on March,2012.
15. COPE - The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Promoting integrity in research publication. COPE; 2012 cited 2012 March 15th; Available at: http://publicationethics.org/.
16. Korpela KM. How long does it take for the scientific literature to purge itself of fraudulent material?: the Breuning case revisited. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010;26:843-7.
2. Franzen M, Rodder S, Weingart P. Fraud: causes and culprits as perceived by science and the media. Institutional changes, rather than individual motivations, encourage misconduct. EMBO Rep. 2007;8:3-7.
3. Steen RG. Misinformation in the medical literature: what role do error and fraud play? J Med Ethics. 2011;37:498-503.
4. Steen RG. Retractions in the medical literature: how many patients are put at risk by flawed research? J Med Ethics. 2011;37:688-92.
5. Steen RG. Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud? J Med Ethics. 2011;37:113-7.
6. Sackett DL. Bias in analytic research. J Chronic Dis. 1979;32:51-63.
7. Rothman K, Greenland S. Modern epidemiology. 2nd edition ed. Rothman K, Greenland S, editors. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1998. 79-91.
8. Buzzelli DE. The Definition of Misconduct in Science: A View from NSF. Science. 1993;259:584-648.
9. Aldrete JA. Plagio y otros traspasos literario-cientificos en medicina y particularmente en anestesiologia. Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2011;39:217-29.
10. Gonzalez Sandoval DC. Plagio: Una problematica de la mente humana. Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2011;39:271.
11. Rojas Chavarro MN, Olarte Collazos JM. Plagio en el ambito academico. Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2010;38:537-8.
12. Nylenna M, Andersen D, Dahlquist G, Sarvas M, Aakvaag A. Handling of scientific dishonesty in the Nordic countries. National Committees on Scientific Dishonesty in the Nordic Countries. Lancet. 1999;354:57-61.
13. Carlisle JB. The analysis of 169 randomised controlled trials to test data integrity. Anaesthesia. 2012;doi:10.1111/j.1365- 2044.2012.07-128.x
14. Marcus A. German Medical Board Issues Sweeping Findings in Boldt Case. Ninety studies implicated in probe, might require retraction. Anesthesiology News, The independent monthly newspaper for anesthesiologists. 2011; February 14. Available in http://m.anesthesiologynews.com/Article.aspx?d=Web+Exclusives&d_id=175&i=February+2011&i_id=702&a_id=16596. Accesed on March,2012.
15. COPE - The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Promoting integrity in research publication. COPE; 2012 cited 2012 March 15th; Available at: http://publicationethics.org/.
16. Korpela KM. How long does it take for the scientific literature to purge itself of fraudulent material?: the Breuning case revisited. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010;26:843-7.
How to Cite
1.
Eslava-Schmalbach J, Escobar-Córdoba F. Random Error, Bias and Fraud in Scientific Publications. Colomb. J. Anesthesiol. [Internet]. 2012 Apr. 1 [cited 2024 May 5];40(2):91-4. Available from: https://www.revcolanest.com.co/index.php/rca/article/view/780
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2012-04-01
How to Cite
1.
Eslava-Schmalbach J, Escobar-Córdoba F. Random Error, Bias and Fraud in Scientific Publications. Colomb. J. Anesthesiol. [Internet]. 2012 Apr. 1 [cited 2024 May 5];40(2):91-4. Available from: https://www.revcolanest.com.co/index.php/rca/article/view/780
Issue
Section
Editorial
Altmetric
| Article metrics | |
|---|---|
| Abstract views | |
| Galley vies | |
| PDF Views | |
| HTML views | |
| Other views | |
