Regional Spinal Anesthesia for C-section and Postpartum Pomeroy. Administering a Local Anesthetic at a <60 or >60 Seconds Injection Rate

  • Diana Carolina Hoyos Cerón Médica, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia
  • José Ricardo Navarro Vargas Profesor Asociado, Departamento de Cirugía Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia
  • Javier Eslava-Schmalbach Profesor Asociado, Departamento de Cirugía Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia
Keywords: Anesthesia, cesarean section, tubal ligation, local anesthetic agents.

Abstract

Objective. To identify any potential relationship between the rate of administration of the anesthetic agent in the subarachnoid space and the development of hypotension and side effects in patients scheduled for C-section and postpartum Pomeroy.

Methods. Observational case series study at the Instituto Materno Infantil-Hospital La Victoria. 60 patients who underwent a C-section procedure or a postpartum Pomeroy were included and two variables were measured: the rate of administration of the anesthetic agent in the subarachnoid space (<60 or >60 seconds) and the effects of two anesthetics combined (0.5 % hyperbaric bupivacaine 7.5 mg, plus morphine 100 mcg, and 0.5 % hyperbaric bupivacaine 12 mg, plus fentanyl 20 mcg). The mean blood pressure values were recorded, together with any side effects following the administration of the anesthetic agent at 1, 5, 10 and 15 minutes and at the end of surgery.

Results. The evidence obtained suggests that there are no differences in the hemodynamic effects of the combination or the anesthetic technique used, nor with regards to the occurrence of side effects.

References

1. Navarro Vargas JR. Anestesia para cesárea regional vs general. Rev Col Anest. 1999;27:227-36.
2. Lee SHR. Anesthesia for postpartum sterilization. En: Norris MC, Obstetric Anesthesia, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999. p. 685- 95.
3. Rout CC, Rocke DA, Levin J, et al. A reevaluation of the role of crystalloid preload in the prevention of hypotension associated with spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section. Anesthesiology. 1993;79:262-9.
4. Beye MD, Ka-Sall B, Diouf E, et al. Spinal anaesthesia for cesarean section: rate and management of complications in 110 Senegalese parturients. Dakar Med. 2002;47:244-6.
5. Reynolds F, Seed PT. Anaesthesia for caesarean section and neonatal acid-base status: a meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2005;60:636-53.
6. Kol IO, Kaygusuz K, Gursoy S, et al. The effects of intravenous ephedrine during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. J Korean Med Sci. 2009;24:883-8.
7. Mercier FJ, Bonnet MP, De la Dorie A, et al. Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: fluid loading, vasopressors and hypotension. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2007;26:688-93.
8. Ayorinde BT, Buczkowski P, Brown J, et al. Evaluation of pre-emptive intramuscular phenylephrine and ephedrine for reduction of spinal anaesthesiainduced hypotension during Caesarean section. Br J Anaesth. 2001;86:372-6.
9. Bouchnak M, Belhadj N, Chaaoua T, et al. Spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section: does injection speed have an effect on the incidence of hypotension? Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2006;25:17-9.
10. Simon L, Boulay G, Ziane AF, et al. Effect on injection rate on hypotension associated with spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2000;9:10-4.
11. Robson SC, Samsoon G, Boys RJ, et al. Incremental spinal anesthesia for elective caesarean section, maternal and fetal haemodynamic effects. Br J Anaesth. 1993;70:634-8.
12. Rout CC, Rocke DA. Prevention of hypotension following spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 1994;32:117-35.
13. Butterworth JF, Walker FO, Lysak SZ. Pregnancy increases median nerve susceptibility to lidocaine. Anesthesiology. 1990;72:962-5.
14. Reyes R, Navarro JR, Camargo H. Anestesia espinal para cesárea con bupivacaína pesada al 0.5% 7 mg más fentanyl 20 mcg vs bupivacaína pesada al 0.5% 9 mg. Rev Col Anest. 2002;30:179-89.
15. Mc Clure JH, Brown DT, Wildsmith JAW. Effect of injectate volume and speed injection on the spread of spinal anaesthesia with isobaric amethocaine. Br J Anaesth 1982; 54: 917-920
16. Simon L, Boulay G, Ziane AF, Noblesse E, Mathiot JL, Toubas MF, Hamaza J. Effect of injection rate on hypotension associated with spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia. 2000; 9: 10-14
17. Tuominen M, Pitkanen M, Rosenberg PH. Effect of speed injection of 0.5 % plain bupivacaine on the spread of spinal anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1992; 69: 148-149.
18. Van Gessel EF, Gamulin Z. High injection speed overwhelms other maneuvers for controlling the spread of spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1995; 81: 427-428.
How to Cite
1.
Hoyos Cerón DC, Navarro Vargas JR, Eslava-Schmalbach J. Regional Spinal Anesthesia for C-section and Postpartum Pomeroy. Administering a Local Anesthetic at a <60 or >60 Seconds Injection Rate. Colomb. J. Anesthesiol. [Internet]. 2011 Jul. 1 [cited 2024 Apr. 29];39(3):341-50. Available from: https://www.revcolanest.com.co/index.php/rca/article/view/839

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2011-07-01
How to Cite
1.
Hoyos Cerón DC, Navarro Vargas JR, Eslava-Schmalbach J. Regional Spinal Anesthesia for C-section and Postpartum Pomeroy. Administering a Local Anesthetic at a <60 or >60 Seconds Injection Rate. Colomb. J. Anesthesiol. [Internet]. 2011 Jul. 1 [cited 2024 Apr. 29];39(3):341-50. Available from: https://www.revcolanest.com.co/index.php/rca/article/view/839
Section
Original

Altmetric

Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views
QR Code