Ultrasound identification of the cricothyroid membrane. Systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Introduction: The no-ventilation no-oxygenation situation is extremely important due to its high mortality. In these cases, open cricothyroidotomy is indicated. Around fifty percent of the difficulties are the result of inadequate identification of the cricothyroid membrane (CTM).
Objective: To determine whether ultrasonography is superior to palpation to identify the CTM at the first attempt.
Methods: A systematic review and a meta-analysis were conducted on the identification of the cricothyroid membrane versus palpation in Medline/Central and Embase. Clinical controlled trials and observational studies were included. Two authors independently and in duplicate selected the studies, assessed the biases and extracted the data; a random effects meta-analysis was successfully conducted for the correct identification of the CTM. The risk of metabias was assessed and the certainty of the evidence was qualified.
Results: 464 studies were included of which 15 met the eligibility criteria; 6 were clinical trials y 9 were observational. Ultrasound is superior to palpation in the detection of the CTM (RR 1.88, 95 % CI 1.05; 3.36) according to the clinical trials, and it was also superior in observational studies (RR 1.76, 95 % CI 1.36; 2.28). The association was preserved in the sensitivity analyses.
Conclusion: Ultrasonography is superior to palpation for the correct identification of the TCM, though the certainty of the evidence is low. Further studies with better methodology are needed to improve both certainty and precision - CRD42021223961.
References
Meier I, Vogt AP, Meineri M, Kaiser HA, Luedi MM, Braun M. Point-of-care ultrasound in the preoperative setting. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2020;34(2):315-24. doi: www.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2020.04.010.
Zetlaoui PJ. Ultrasonography for airway management. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2021;40(2):100821. doi: www.doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2021.100821.
Detsky ME, Jivraj N, Adhikari NK, Friedrich JO, Pinto R, Simel DL, et al. Will this patient be difficult to intubate?: The rational clinical examination systematic review. JAMA. 2019;321(5):493-503. doi: www.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.21413. Erratum in: JAMA. 2020 Mar 24;323(12):1194.
Sotoodehnia M, Rafiemanesh H, Mirfazaelian H, Safaie A, Baratloo A. Ultrasonography indicators for predicting difficult intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Emerg Med. 2021;21(1):76. doi: www.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-021-00472-w.
Carsetti A, Sorbello M, Adrario E, Donati A, Falcetta S. Airway ultrasound as predictor of difficult direct laryngoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2022;134(4):740-50. doi: www.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000005839.
Joffe AM, Aziz MF, Posner KL, Duggan LV, Mincer SL, Domino KB. Management of difficult tracheal intubation: A closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology. 2019;131(4):818-29. doi: www.doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000002815.
Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 20151;4(1):1. doi: www.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898. doi: www.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898.
Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355:i4919. doi: www.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919.
GRADEpro GDT: GRADEpro Guideline Development Tool [Software]. McMaster University and Evidence Prime, 2022. Disponible en: gradepro.org.
Thorlund K, Engstrøm J, Wetterslev J, Brok J, Imberger G, Gluud C (2017). User manual for trial sequential analysis (TSA) [pdf] [internet]. [citado: 2022 sep. 26]. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Trial Unit, pp. 1-119. Available at: ctu.dk/tsa.
Kristensen MS, Teoh WH, Rudolph SS, Tvede MF, Hesselfeldt R, Børglum J, et al. Structured approach to ultrasound-guided identification of the cricothyroid membrane: a randomized comparison with the palpation method in the morbidly obese. Br J Anaesth. 2015;114(6):1003-4. doi: www.doi.org/10.1093/bja/aev123.
Siddiqui N, Arzola C, Friedman Z, Guerina L, You-Ten KE. Ultrasound improves cricothyrotomy success in cadavers with poorly defined neck anatomy: A randomized control trial. Anesthesiology. 2015;123(5):1033-41. doi: www.doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000000848.
You-Ten KE, Desai D, Postonogova T, Siddiqui N. Accuracy of conventional digital palpation and ultrasound of the cricothyroid membrane in obese women in labour. Anaesthesia. 2015;70(11):1230-4. doi: www.doi.org/10.1111/anae.13167.
Forshaw N, Navaratnarajah J, Dobby N. Identifying the cricothyroid membrane in children: palpation versus ultrasound. Br J Anaesth. 2018;121(1):e13. doi: www.doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2018.02.057.
Siddiqui N, Yu E, Boulis S, You-Ten KE. Ultrasound is superior to palpation in identifying the cricothyroid membrane in subjects with poorly defined neck landmarks: A randomized clinical trial. Anesthesiology. 2018;129(6):1132-1139. doi: www.doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000002454.
Van Emden MW, Geurts JJG, Craenen AMC, Schwarte LA, Schober P. Cricothyroid membrane identification with ultrasonography and palpation in cadavers with a novel fixation technique (Fix for Life): A laboratory investigation. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020;37(6):510-512. doi: www.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000001230.
Aslani A, Ng SC, Hurley M, McCarthy KF, McNicholas M, McCaul CL. Accuracy of identification of the cricothyroid membrane in female subjects using palpation: an observational study. Anesth Analg. 2012;114(5):987-92. doi: www.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e31824970ba.
Barbe N, Martin P, Pascal J, Heras C, Rouffiange P, Molliex S. Locating the cricothyroid membrane in learning phase: value of ultrasonography?. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2014;33(3):163-6 [francés]. doi: www.doi.org/10.1016/j.annfar.2014.01.006.
Lamb A, Zhang J, Hung O, Flemming B, Mullen T, Bissell MB, et al. Accuracy of identifying the cricothyroid membrane by anesthesia trainees and staff in a Canadian institution. Can J Anaesth. 2015;62(5):495-503. doi: www.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-015-0326-y.
Yıldız G, Göksu E, Şenfer A, Kaplan A. Comparison of ultrasonography and surface landmarks in detecting the localization for cricothyroidotomy. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34(2):254-6. doi: www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2015.10.054.
Basaran B, Egilmez AI, Alatas N, Yilbas AA, Sargin M. Accuracy of identifying the cricothyroid membrane in children using palpation. J Anesth. 2018;32(5):768-73. doi: www.doi.org/10.1007/s00540-018-2538-0.
Oh H, Yoon S, Seo M, Oh E, Yoon H, Lee H, et al. Utility of the laryngeal handshake method for identifying the cricothyroid membrane. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018;62(9):1223-8. doi: www.doi.org/10.1111/aas.13169.
Altun D, Ali A, Koltka K, Buget M, Çelik M, Doruk C, et al. Role of ultrasonography in determining the cricothyroid membrane localization in the predicted difficult airway. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2019;25(4):355-60. doi: www.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2019.65250.
Bowness J, Teoh WH, Kristensen MS, Dalton A, Saint-Grant AL, Taylor A, et al. A marking of the cricothyroid membrane with extended neck returns to correct position after neck manipulation and repositioning. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020;64(10):1422-5. doi: www.doi.org/10.1111/aas.13680.
Lavelle A, Drew T, Fennessy P, McCaul C, Shannon J. Accuracy of cricothyroid membrane identification using ultrasound and palpation techniques in obese obstetric patients: an observational study. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2021;48:103205. doi: www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2021.103205.
Hung KC, Chen IW, Lin CM, Sun CK. Comparison between ultrasound-guided and digital palpation techniques for identification of the cricothyroid membrane: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2021;126(1):e9-e11. doi: www.doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2020.08.012.
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2020 Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
| Article metrics | |
|---|---|
| Abstract views | |
| Galley vies | |
| PDF Views | |
| HTML views | |
| Other views | |
